Medicare for all and Tricare

single payer
Photo Credit: Michael Fleshman

Medicare-for-all is shaping up to be a major focus for Democrats looking to replace President Donald Trump in the 2020 election. Still when Kamala Harris came out in favor of eliminating private insurance companies – a staple in most single payer systems, Democrats recoiled.

That begs the question do Democrats really know what they are pushing for when they are demanding a single payer system? The closest resemblance to a single payer system in the United States is Tricare, the health insurance military members are given (For those that want to be technical, Tricare Prime).

And as such I think that it’s the perfect way to evaluate how a single payer system would work in the United States. Yes, I understand the funding will be different, but most Americans DO realize that going to a single payer system would result in an increase in taxes – and by how much is still up for a bit of debate, although countries in Europe provide a good estimate for this.

Now as a military member I had Tricare for several years, so I know a few things about how it works from a user’s perspective.

The cost to the user has to be the biggest advantage in a single payer system – now I understand that we will all be “paying” for it in a national single payer system through taxes, but the difference is it doesn’t matter if you get cancer, you won’t get a bill. It’s stress free, you no longer have to worry about if your health or a freak accident is going to bankrupt you. You don’t have to worry about copays or deductibles, you just know your covered.

My kids have a variety of (small) medical issues, their therapies never cost me a dime on Tricare. When I talked to their doctors about what they needed I never had to ask about the cost, instead I got to ask about what the best treatment options were without having to worry about if I could afford it.

Furthermore, with Tricare preexisting conditions don’t matter. Now to get on Tricare as a military member preexisting conditions are a thing, they won’t let you join the military if you have a multitude of different health concerns, thus excluding you from Tricare. However, for spouses or kids, it doesn’t matter what they have – as soon as they marry the service member everything is 100% covered. With a single payer system, you don’t have to marry a military member to get this kind of full coverage if you have a preexisting condition. Simply by being an American you would have healthcare.

Still the biggest drawback on a single payer system is your ability to choose your doctor. In Tricare you are assigned a primary care doctor who handles all your day to day care and refers you out to other specialists if you need them. While that works great if you have a good primary care doctor, if he isn’t any good it can lead to a lot of headaches. While you can change your primary care doctor it can be a pain.

In a civilian single payer system there would have to be a system to address who you can see, if not everyone is going to want to see the top doctor every time their nose runs. I think a system where you have a choice between 3 primary care doctors – think a family health doctor, that can refer you out to specialists is the way to go. Of course, being limited on who you can see is a definite drawback of the system.

With this information and my personal experience on Tricare I am a strong activist for a single payer system. It is insane that in the United States there are people that lose every dime in their savings account or go into massive debt because they fall and break their arm. It’s even crazier that there are people with cancer that can’t get treatment because they can’t afford it. They are sentenced to die because they can’t afford the care that could save their life. People deserve better, and in America we have the option to give them better, it’s beyond time we did so.


5 thoughts on “Medicare for all and Tricare

  1. Most of those who object to a public single payer health insurance system in the U.S – both Republican and old style Democrat- have never taken a look at Canada where such a system works.

    It works so well that no one on any portion of the political spectrum in Canada be they on the left, center or moderate right wants to do away with it.

    The only time it didn’t work was when those on the far right assumed power in various provinces and tried to introduce privatization into the system.

    Such as happened in Alberta under far right Premier Ralph Klein back in the 1990s, British Columbia Premier Christy Clark in this decade and as newly elected far right Premier Doug Ford hopes to implement in the province of Ontario.

    This is the same system that is also in place in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland where it works very well.

    It is the system in those northern European countries that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants to put in place for the U.S.

    That area of northern Europe that most commentators on Fox News always refer to as Venezuela when attacking Ocasio-Cortez’s policy (no doubt as a result of having flunked Geography and every other subject in High School and College that qualifies them to be commentators on Fox News).


    1. No one with a single payer system is advocating they go to a private insurance system like the United States. No country in the world spends more on healthcare per person then the United States. Clearly we need a change but the GOP offers no solution and instead just wants to obstruct any progress.


  2. I’m an American living in Britain, and one of the savings associated with the National Health Service that surprised me is that car insurance is cheaper. In a catastrophic accident, you don’t get the associated catastrophic medical bills. People can, and some do, buy private insurance, but this too is much cheaper than it would be in the US because emergency care isn’t covered–for that you rely on the NHS. And of course, like all private insurance, they exclude all sorts of things.

    The NHS is, admittedly, different from medicare for all, but the parallel’s close enough. It’s much loved here–I think of it as the national religion. Recent governments have, unfortunately, underfunded it and done their damnedest to privatize it, but it’s still better than the US system, where any serious illness can run a person into bankruptcy.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The US “system” is a joke. So many people don’t have health insurance, and so many that do can’t even afford to use it.
      What truly inspired this post is all my military friends blasting a Medicare for all system, despite the fact that they are essentially on one the closest equivalent.

      Anyway thanks for stopping by and checking out the blog and leaving the comment!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s